05/27/2004
IMMIGRATION ALERT
PERM IS COMING
The long-delayed PERM program (last reported by HLG's Immigration Alerts
here:
http://www.hammondlawfirm.com/alerts/03.23.2004alert.htm) is about to
come on-line.
AILA sources are reporting that the program's regulations will be
published on or shortly after June 7, 2004. The program will go into
effect four months after publication. Indeed, the Department of Labor is
actively recruiting for several PERM-related positions. Humorously, none
of the positions appear to qualify for employment-based permanent
residency sponsorship, since the positions are temporary in nature.
Two years ago HLG published a comprehensive review of the PERM program
based on the 2002 release of preliminary regulations. For your convenience
that Summary is re-published below. It is worth noting that it is expected
that the latest regulations do contain some changes from the 2002
preliminary regulations.
The Proposed "PERM" Labor Certification Program
The Department of Labor recently issued regulations to severely revamp the
labor certification process and to amend some features of the H-1b
program. The Department of Labor has planned the new program, called the
"PERM" program, for the last few years because of the longstanding
criticism that the current labor certification process is complex, time
consuming, and involves a significant expenditure of resources on behalf
of employers, SESA's and the federal government while doing little to
protect U.S. workers. While employers, foreign nationals and immigration
attorneys have anticipated the PERM program for several years, the
proposed Regulations outline a revamped system that is must stricter than
anyone could have reasonably anticipated. Perhaps based in part on the
current state of the economy, the proposed Regulations are intended to
"maximize protection to U.S. workers" and to deter employers from the
tendency to "manipulate" the job requirements "in favor of the alien
incumbent to the disadvantage of U.S. workers."
Throughout the proposed regulations, the Department of Labor makes
numerous statements expressing its belief that there are unscrupulous
employers who are manipulating the current system. Therefore, the proposed
regulations contain an increased emphasis on enforcement of the labor
certification program through audits on selective cases and severe
penalties for applicants who fail to comply with the requirements. For
example, if the Department of Labor requests the employer to submit
documentation to substantiate its statements in the application and the
employer fails to respond within 21 days, the Department of Labor will
view the failure to respond as a "material misrepresentation" on the
application. This is intended to "dissuade those small number of employers
that conceivably may file applications without complying with all the
documentation requirements". In addition, if the Certifying Officer
determines that an employer materially misrepresents information on an
application, it will place the employer on a two-year probation by
restricting the employer from using the pre-filing recruitment and require
the employer to use the supervised recruitment method. Furthermore, the
proposed regulations provide Certifying Officers with authority to revoke
labor certifications within one year of the date the labor certification
is granted or before a visa number is available, whichever occurs first.
Interestingly, the regulations do not describe the circumstances under
which the Certifying Officers can revoke the application.
Under the PERM program, the labor certification process would involve the
following procedure: First, the employer will file a PWDR, Prevailing Wage
Determination Form-ETA Form 9088, with the State Workforce Agency to
obtain the prevailing wage for the position. The form would include the
job description, job duties and job requirements. Second, the employer
will conduct extensive recruitment for the position, using standards which
are stricter than the current recruitment procedures under either the
basic labor certification process or the reduction in recruitment process.
Third, the employer will complete the Application for Permanent Labor
Certification -ETA Form 9089 which consists of 56 questions designed to
elicit information regarding the employer's recruitment efforts. Fourth,
the employer will file the Prevailing Wage Determination Form and the
Application for Permanent Labor Certification with the Certifying Officer
of the Department of Labor for automated processing. Fifth, the Department
of Labor, through the automated processing, will either approve the case
in approximately 21 days or request the employer to submit proof of the
recruitment if the case is selected for audit. The Department of Labor may
select a case for audit based upon information on the application;
however, the Department of Labor will also select cases for audit on a
random basis. The Department of Labor anticipates that approximately 20%
of the cases filed will be selected for audit. After the certifying
officer reviews the application pursuant to an audit, it can do one of
three things: certify the application, deny the application, or order
supervised recruitment. If the Department of Labor orders supervised
recruitment the employer will have to conduct further recruitment, similar
to the current non-RIR recruitment scheme which consists of an
advertisement along with a 30-day job order and a recruitment summary,
despite the fact that the employer previously conducted significant
recruitment before filing the application. The supervised recruitment
under the PERM program will differ from the current recruitment in the
basic labor certification case only in that the regional departments of
labor rather than the state agencies will supervise the recruitment.
The PERM program would allow the Department of Labor to process
applications more quickly and reduce the current backlog. Specifically,
the combination of automated processing system for the applications and
elimination of state employment security agencies role in the labor
certification process would enable the Department of Labor to process an
application within 21 days, in cases where the Department of Labor does
not order supervised recruitment.
Although applications can be processed more quickly under the PERM
program, the strict standards of the program may significantly reduce the
number of applications that may ultimately be approved. Companies who
employ foreign nationals should be aware of the following significant
changes that could take effect if the PERM program is implemented
according to the proposed regulations.
Expansion of the recruitment
procedures: Prior to filing an application,
employers will have to conduct recruitment at least 30 days but no more than
180 days before the filing. The recruitment must consist of mandatory
recruitment methods including a job order with the SESA, two advertisements
that identify the employer and include a job description; such
advertisements must be placed at least 28 days apart in the Sunday newspaper
except that one of the advertisements can be placed in an appropriate
journal in lieu of the Sunday advertisement if the position requires
experience and an advanced degree. In addition to the SESA job order and the
two advertisements, the employer must post the internal posting in all
in-house media throughout the company and conduct three alternate
recruitment steps from professional recruitment channels such as job fairs,
job search web sites and private employment agencies.
Discretionary authority to order
supervised recruitment: The Department of Labor
can order the employer to undergo supervised recruitment, even after the
employer produces significant pre-filing recruitment. The supervised
recruitment is similar to the current recruitment procedures under the basic
labor certification process except that it is supervised by the Department
of Labor rather than a SESA. The proposed regulations give the Department
of Labor authority to order supervised recruitment in certain circumstances
including cases of layoffs, however, the regulations do not clarify all the
circumstances that may trigger supervised recruitment
Restriction on Job Requirements:
The proposed regulations restrict the job requirements in several ways.
First, if the job requires a "combination of duties" (i.e. the job involves
duties from two occupations) the employer would not be able to include
requirements for both positions unless the company employed a U.S. worker in
that position within two years of filing the labor certification. Second,
if the job requires skills that are not typical for the job, the employer
will not be able to include the requirements even if it is a "business
necessity" in the context of the employers business. Third, an employer
would not be able to include alternate requirements for the job. For
example, a company who files an application for a software engineer will not
be able to state alternate requirements such as experience as a consultant,
programmer analyst, systems analyst nor will the company be allowed to
accept the alternate requirement of a degree or equivalent years of
experience.
Restriction on applicants'
qualifications for the job: The PERM Regulations
narrows the permissible experience of the foreign national and, at the same
time, broadens the qualifications of the U.S. workers. The regulations do
not allow the foreign national to qualify for the job based upon any
experience gained with the current employer. This change would
significantly limit the ability of employers to obtain labor certification
for its L-1b employees. Under the current labor certification program, a
foreign national can use experience with the same employer if either the
experience was gained in a different position with the company or if it is
no longer feasible for the company to train for the position. The PERM
Regulations do not allow the foreign national's experience with the same
employer to count under any circumstances. At the same time, the PERM
regulations prohibit an employer from disqualifying a U.S. worker from the
job if the U.S. worker simply fails to meet one of the requirements of if
the U.S. worker can be trained on the job in a reasonable amount of time.
Increase in the wage obligation:
The current regulations allow the employer to pay the foreign national a
wage that is within 95% of the prevailing wage. However, the PERM
regulations eliminate the 5% variance, thereby requiring the employer to pay
100% of the prevailing wage.
Severe amendments to the H-1b
Program: The PERM Regulations make two
significant amendments to the H-1b program. First, the Regulations require
the employer to pay 100% of the prevailing wage rather than 95% of the
prevailing wage. Second, the Regulations require the employer to increase
the wage during the three-year H-1b petition as the H-1b worker moves from
an inexperienced employee to an experienced employee and the increase must
be consistent with the experience levels in the wage survey filed with the
H-1b petition.